Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026)

Tip dating supports a Middle Ordovician origin for total-group chondrichthyans and a rapid radiation of acanthodian-grade taxa

DOI
https://doi.org/10.26034/la.opal.2026.8549
Submitted
4 September 2025
Published
02-03-2026

Abstract

The early evolutionary history of acanthodians, a paraphyletic group of Palaeozoic stem chondrichthyans, is reconstructed using a comprehensive and updated morphological phylogenetic dataset consisting of 429 characters scored for 87 articulated taxa. Results of a time-calibrated Bayesian analysis suggest a Middle Ordovician origin for total-group Chondrichthyes, coinciding with the end of the Great Ordovician Biodiversification Event, and an Early Devonian age for the most recent common ancestor of crown Chondrichthyes. Further, major acanthodian lineages are inferred to originate towards the end of the Late Ordovician. This supports a diversification model in which interordinal cladogenesis occurred in the Middle-Late Ordovician and most intraordinal cladogenesis occurred in the Silurian. Divergence dates and short internodes inferred by the tip-dating analysis indicate a relatively rapid pattern of successive cladogenetic splits for major groups of acanthodians that diverged from the chondrichthyan stem in the Darriwilian and Sandbian. These speciation events possibly produced daughter lineages that remained morphologically similar to their ancestors before undergoing other cladogenetic splits, as suggested by the relatively low rates of morphological evolution (number of morphological changes per million year) reconstructed for the same branches. The lack of synapomorphies resulting from such a compressed pattern of divergences is likely the cause of low branch support and the topological instability that characterizes acanthodian relationships. The results presented in this study confirm that underlying evolutionary processes such as rapid radiations, in conjunction with the fragmentary nature of the fossil record, can further negatively impact phylogenetic reconstruction based on morphological data.

References

  1. Agassiz, L. 1844. Monographie des poissons fossiles des Vieux Grès Rouges ou Système Dévonien (Old Red Sandstone) des Îles Britanniques et de Russie. Imprimerie de Petitpierre et Prince, Neuchâtel.
  2. Andreev, P.S., Sansom, I.J., Li, Q., Zhao, W., Wang, J., Wang, C.-C., Peng, L., Jia, L., Qiao, T. and Zhu, M. 2022a. The oldest gnathostome teeth. Nature, 609, 964–968. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05166-2
  3. Andreev, P.S., Sansom, I.J., Li, Q., Zhao, W., Wang, J., Wang, C.‑C., Peng, L., Jia, L., Qiao, T. and Zhu, M. 2022b. Spiny chondrichthyan from the lower Silurian of South China. Nature, 609, 969–974. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586‑022‑05233‑8
  4. Bapst, D.W. 2013. When can clades be potentially resolved with morphology? PLoS ONE 8:4, e62312. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0062312
  5. Barido-Sottani, J., Aguirre-Fernández, G., Hopkins, M.J., Stadler, T. and Warnock, R. 2019. Ignoring stratigraphic age uncertainty leads to erroneous estimates of species divergence times under the fossilized birth–death process. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286:1902, 20190685. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.0685
  6. Beznosov, P. 2009. A redescription of the Early Carboniferous acanthodian Acanthodes lopatini Rohon, 1889. Acta Zoologica 90:s1, 183–193 https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6395.2008.00352.x
  7. Blais, S.A., 2017. Precise occlusion and trophic niche differentiation indicate specialized feeding in Early Devonian jawed vertebrates. FACETS 2, 513-530. https://doi.org/10.1139/facets-2016-0030
  8. Blais, S.A., Hermus, C. R., and Wilson, M. V. H. 2015. Four new Early Devonian ischnacanthid acanthodians from the Mackenzie Mountains, Northwest Territories, Canada: An early experiment in dental diversity. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 35:1, e948546. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.2014.948546
  9. Brazeau, M.D., Castiello, M., El Fassi El Fehri, A., Hamilton, L., Ivanov, A.O., Johanson, Z., Friedman, M. 2023. Fossil evidence for a pharyngeal origin of the vertebrate pectoral girdle. Nature 623, 550–554. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-023-06702-4
  10. Brito, P.M. and Ferreira, P.L.N. 1989. The first Hybodont shark, Tribodus limae n. gen., n. sp., from the Lower Cretaceous of Chapada do Araripe (North-East Brazil). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciências, 61:1, 53–57
  11. Burrow, C.J., den Blaauwen, J., Newman, M., and Davidson, R. 2016. The diplacanthid fishes (Acanthodii, Diplacanthiformes, Diplacanthidae) from the Middle Devonian of Scotland. Palaeontologia Electronica 19.1.10A: 1-83. https://doi.org/10.26879/601
  12. Burrow, C.J. and Rudkin D. 2014. Oldest near-complete acanthodian: The first vertebrate from the Silurian Bertie Formation Konservat-Lagerstätte, Ontario. PLoS ONE 9:8, e104171. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0104171
  13. Caetano, D.S. and Quental, T. B. 2023. How important is budding speciation for comparative studies? Systematic Biology 72:6, 1443–1453, https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syad050
  14. Cai, L., Xi, Z., Lemmon, E.M., Lemmon, A.R., Mast, A., Buddenhagen, C. E., Liu, L., and Davis, C.C. 2021. The perfect storm: Gene tree estimation error, incomplete lineage sorting, and ancient gene flow explain the most recalcitrant ancient angiosperm clade, Malpighiales. Systematic Biology 70:3, 491–507. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaa083.
  15. Caparros, M., and Prat, S. 2021. A phylogenetic networks perspective on reticulate human evolution. iScience 24:4, 102359. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isci.2021.102359
  16. Chan, K.O., Hutter, C.R., Wood, P.L., Grismer, L.L., and Brown, R.M. 2020. Target-capture phylogenomics provide insights on gene and species tree discordances in Old World tree frogs (Anura: Rhacophoridae). Proceedings of the Royal Society B. 287, 20202102. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2020.2102.
  17. Chevrinais M., Sire J.-Y. and Cloutier R. 2017. From body scale ontogeny to species ontogeny: Histological and morphological assessment of the Late Devonian acanthodian Triazeugacanthus affinis from Miguasha, Canada. PLoS ONE 12:4, e0174655. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0174655
  18. Cui, X., Friedman, M., Yu, Y., Zhu, Y. an, Zhu, M. 2023. Bony-fish-like scales in a Silurian maxillate placoderm. Nature Communications 14, 7622. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-43557-9
  19. Cui, X., Qiao, T., Peng, L. and Zhu, M. 2025. New material of the Early Devonian sarcopterygian Styloichthys changae illuminates the origin of cosmine. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 23:1. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2024.2432273
  20. Davis, S.P., Finarelli, J.A. and Coates, M.I. 2012. Acanthodes and shark-like conditions in the last common ancestor of modern gnathostomes. Nature, 486, 247–250. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature11080
  21. Denison, R. 1979. Acanthodii. Handbook of paleoichthyology, Vol. 5. Verlag Dr Friedrich Pfeil, 62 pp.
  22. Duff, P. 1842. Sketch of the Geology of Moray. Forsyth and Young, Elgin.
  23. Fishbein, M., Hibsch-Jetter, C., Soltis, D.E., and Hufford, L. 2001. Phylogeny of saxifragales (Angiosperms, Eudicots): analysis of a rapid, ancient radiation. Systematic Biology 50, 817–847. https://doi.org/10.1080/106351501753462821
  24. Frey, L., Coates, M., Ginter, M., Hairapetian, V., Rücklin, M., Jerjen, I. & Klug, C. 2019. The early elasmobranch Phoebodus: Phylogenetic relationships, ecomorphology, and a new time-scale for shark evolution. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 286, 20191336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2019.1336
  25. Fonseca, A.O., Reid, I.J., Venner, A., Duncan, R.J., Garcia, M.S., and Müller, R.T. 2024. A comprehensive phylogenetic analysis on early ornithischian evolution. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 22:1, 2346577. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2024.2346577
  26. Gavryushkina, A., Welch, D., Stadler, T., and Drummond, A.J. 2014. Bayesian inference of sampled ancestor trees for epidemiology and fossil calibration. PLoS Computational Biology 10:12, e1003919. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003919
  27. Goujet, D. 1975. Dicksonosteus, un nouvel arthrodire du Dévonien du Spitsberg — Remarques sur le squelette viscéral des Dolichothoraci. Colloques internationaux du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique 218, 81–99.
  28. Harper, D.A.T., Cascales-Miñana, B. and Servais, T. 2019. Early Palaeozoic diversifications and extinctions in the marine biosphere: A continuum of change. Geological Magazine 157:1, 5–21. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0016756819001298.hdl:20.500.12210/34267
  29. Heath, T.A., Huelsenbeck, J.P. and Stadler, T. 2014. The fossilized birth–death process for coherent calibration of divergence-time estimates. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 111:29, E2957–E2966. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1319091111
  30. Holland, B. and Moulton, V. 2003. Consensus networks: a method for visualising incompatibilities in collections of trees. Pp. 165–176. In G. Benson and R. Page (Eds.) Algorithms in bioinformatics. Volume 2812. Springer, Berlin, 270 pp.
  31. Huson, D.H., and Bryant, D. 2006. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Molecular Biology and Evolution 23:2, 254–267. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msj030
  32. Inoue, J.G., Miya, M., Lam, K., Tay, B.H., Danks, J.A., Bell, J., Walker, T.I. and Venkatesh, B. 2010. Evolutionary origin and phylogeny of the modern holocephalans (Chondrichthyes: Chimaeriformes): a mitogenomic perspective. Molecular Biology and Evolution 27:11, 2576–2586. https://doi.org/10.1093/molbev/msq147
  33. Janvier, P. 1996. Early vertebrates. Clarendon Press, 393 pp.
  34. King, B. 2021. Bayesian tip-dated phylogenetics in paleontology: Topological effects and stratigraphic fit, Systematic Biology 70:2, 283–294. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syaa057
  35. King, B., Qiao, T., Lee, M.S.Y., Zhu, M. and Long, J.A. 2017. Bayesian morphological clock methods resurrect placoderm monophyly and reveal rapid early evolution in jawed vertebrates. Systematic Biology 66:4, 499-516. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syw107
  36. King, B. and Rücklin, M. 2020. A Bayesian approach to dynamic homology of morphological characters and the ancestral phenotype of jawed vertebrates. eLife 9:e62374. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.62374
  37. Klug, C., Coates, M., Frey, L., Greif, M., Jobbins, M., Pohle, A., Lagnaoui, A., Bel Haouz, W. and Ginter, M. 2023. Broad snouted cladoselachian with sensory specialization at the base of modern chondrichthyans. Swiss Journal of Palaeontology 142, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13358-023-00266-6
  38. Laing, A.M., Doyle, S., Gold, M.E.L., Nesbitt, S.J., O'Leary, M.A., Turner, A.H., Wilberg, E.W. and Poole, K.E. 2018. Giant taxon-character matrices: The future of morphological systematics. Cladistics 34: 333-335. https://doi.org/10.1111/cla.12197
  39. Larridon, I., Villaverde, T., Zuntini, A.R., Pokorny, L., Brewer, G.E., Epitawalage, N., Fairlie, I., Hahn, M., Kim, J., Maguilla, E., Maurin, O., Xanthos, M., Hipp. A.L., Forest, F. and Baker, W.J. 2020. Tackling rapid radiations with targeted sequencing. Frontiers in Plant Science 10:1655. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01655
  40. Lewis, P.O. 2001. A likelihood approach to estimating phylogeny from discrete morphological character data. Systematic Biology 50:6, 913–925. https://doi.org/10.1080/106351501753462876
  41. Li, Q., Zhu, Y-A., Lu, J., Chen, Y., Wang, J., Peng, L., Wei, G. and Zhu, M. 2021. A new Silurian fish close to the common ancestor of modern gnathostomes. Current Biology 31:16, 3613-3620.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2021.05.053
  42. Long, J.A. 1986. A new Late Devonian acanthodian fish from Mt. Howitt, Victoria, Australia, with remarks on acanthodian biogeography. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria 98: 1-17.
  43. López‑Antoñanzas, R. and Peláez‑Campomanes, P. 2022. Bayesian morphological clock versus Parsimony: an insight into the relationships and dispersal events of postvacuum Cricetidae (Rodentia, Mammalia). Systematic Biology 71:3, 512–525. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syab059
  44. Mallet, J., Besansky, N. and Hahn, M.W. 2016. How reticulated are species?. BioEssays 38: 140-149. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201500149
  45. Marjanović, D. 2021. The making of calibration sausage exemplified by recalibrating the transcriptomic timetree of jawed vertebrates. Frontiers in Genetics 12:521693. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2021.521693
  46. Matzke, N.J. and Irmis, R.B. 2018. Including autapomorphies is important for paleontological tip-dating with clocklike data, but not with non-clock data. PeerJ 6, e4553. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4553
  47. Moon, B.C. 2017. A new phylogeny of ichthyosaurs (Reptilia: Diapsida). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 17:2, 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2017.1394922
  48. Moy-Thomas, J.A. 1971. Subclass Acanthodii. 61–78. In Moy-Thomas, J. A. and Miles, R. S. (eds). Palaeozoic fishes. Springer, 260 pp.
  49. Nelson, G.J. 1969. Gill arches and the phylogeny of fishes, with notes on the classification of vertebrates. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 141, 475–552.
  50. Newman, M.J., den Blaauwen, J.L. and Burrow, C.J. 2020. Two newly identified cheiracanthid acanthodians from the Mey Flagstone Formation (Givetian, Middle Devonian) of the Orcadian Basin, Scotland. Scottish Journal of Geology 57:1, sjg2020–009. doi: https://doi.org/10.1144/sjg2020-009
  51. Newman, M.J., den Blaauwen, J.L., Burrow, C.J., Jones, R. and Davidson, R.G. 2023. The Middle Devonian acanthodian Orcadacanthus n. gen. from the Orcadian Basin of Scotland. Palaeontologia Electronica 26:1, a5. https://doi.org/10.26879/1070
  52. Paleobiology Database. 2024. Accessed: November 2024. https://paleobiodb.org/
  53. Pradel, A., Maisey, J.G., Tafforeau, P. and Janvier, P. 2009. An enigmatic gnathostome vertebrate skull from the Middle Devonian of Bolivia. Acta Zoologica 90: 123-133. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-6395.2008.00350.x
  54. Qiao, T., King, B., Long. J.A., Ahlberg, P.E. and Zhu, M. 2016. Early gnathostome phylogeny revisited: Multiple method consensus. PLoS ONE 11:9, e0163157. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0163157
  55. Rambaut, A., Drummond, A.J., Xie, D., Baele, G. and Suchard, M.A. 2018. Posterior summarization in Bayesian phylogenetics using Tracer 1.7. Systematic Biology 67, 901– 904. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/syy032
  56. Renz, A.J., Meyer, A. and Kuraku, S. 2013. Revealing less derived nature of cartilaginous fish genomes with their evolutionary time scale inferred with nuclear genes. PLoS ONE 8:6, e66400. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0066400
  57. Rohon, J.V. 1889. Über fossile Fische vom oberen Jenissei. Memoires de L’Académie Impériale des Sciences de St-Pétersbourg VII Séri 36: 1–17.
  58. Rokas, A. and Carroll, S.B. 2006. Bushes in the tree of life. PLoS Biology 4:11 899–904 https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0040352
  59. Rokas, A., Kruger, D. and Carroll, S.B. 2005. Animal evolution and the molecular signature of radiations compressed in time. Science 310, 1933–1938 https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1116759
  60. Ronquist, F., Teslenko, M., van der Mark, P., Ayres, D.L., Darling, A., Hohna, S., Larget, B., Liu, L., Suchard, M. A., and Huelsenbeck, J. P. 2012. MrBayes 3.2: Efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Systematic Biology 61, 539–542. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/sys029
  61. Sansom, R. S. 2009. Phylogeny, classification and character polarity of the Osteostraci (Vertebrata). Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 7:1, 95–115. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1477201908002551
  62. Sansom, I.J. and Andreev, P.S. 2018. The Ordovician enigma. Fish, first appearances and phylogenetic controversies. In: Johanson, Z., Underwood, C. and Richter, M. (eds.) Evolution and Development of Fishes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 59–70.
  63. Sanson, I.J., Davies, N.S., Coates, M.I., Nicoll, R.S. and Ritchie, A. 2012. Chondrichthyan-like scales from the Middle Ordovician of Australia. Palaeontology 55: 243-247. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4983.2012.01127.x
  64. Schnetz, L., Butler, R.J., Coates, M.I. and Sansom, I.J. 2022. Skeletal and soft tissue completeness of the acanthodian fossil record. Palaeontology 65: e12616. https://doi.org/10.1111/pala.12616
  65. Schultze, H.P. 1985. Marine to onshore vertebrates in the Lower Permian of Kansas and their paleoenvironmental omplications. University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions 113:1-18
  66. Schultze, H.P. 1990. A new acanthodian from the Pennsylvanian of Utah, U.S.A., and the distribution of otoliths in gnathostomes. Journal of Vertebrate Paleontology 10:1, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/02724634.1990.10011789
  67. Seehausen, O. 2004. Hybridization and adaptive radiation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19:4, 198–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2004.01.003
  68. Serra Silva, A. 2024. Extended Lissamphibia: a tale of character non-independence, analytical parameters and islands of trees. Journal of Systematic Palaeontology 22:1, 2321620, https://doi.org/10.1080/14772019.2024.2321620
  69. Servais, T., Lehnert, O., Li, J., Mullins, G. L., Munnecke, A., Nützel, A. and Vecoli, M. 2008. The Ordovician biodiversification: revolution in the oceanic trophic chain. Lethaia 41:2, 99–109. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1502-3931.2008.00115.x
  70. Shaffer, H.B., Meylan, P. and McKnight, M.L. 1997. Tests of turtle phylogeny: Molecular, morphological, and paleontological approaches. Systematic Biology 46:2, 235–268. https://doi.org/10.1093/sysbio/46.2.235
  71. Simakov, O., Marlétaz, F., Yue, J.X., O’Connell, B., Jenkins, J., Brandt, A., Calef, R., Tung, C.H., Huang, T.K., Schmutz. J., et al. 2020. Deeply conserved synteny resolves early events in vertebrate evolution. Nature Ecology and Evolution 4, 820–830. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-020-1156-z
  72. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP:Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony* and other methods. ver. 4.0a169
  73. Townsend, T.M., Mulcahy, D.G., Noonan, B.P., Sites Jr, J.W., Kuczynski, C.A., Wiens, J. J. and Reeder, T.W. 2011. Phylogeny of iguanian lizards inferred from 29 nuclear loci, and a comparison of concatenated and species-tree approaches for an ancient, rapid radiation. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 61: 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2011.07.008.
  74. Upeniece, I. 1996. Lodeacanthus gaujicus n. g. et sp. (Acanthodii: Mesacanthidae) from the Late Devonian of Latvia. Modern Geology 20, 383–398.
  75. Whitfield, J.B. and Kjer. K.M. 2008. Ancient rapid radiations of insects: challenges for phylogenetic analysis. Annual Review of Entomology 53, 449-472. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ento.53.103106.093304.
  76. Whitfield, J.B. and Lockhart, P.J. 2007. Deciphering ancient rapid radiations. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 22, 258–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.01.012
  77. Zhu, M., Ahlberg, P.E., Pan, Z.-H., Zhu, Y.-A., Qiao, T., Zhao, W.-J., Jia, L.-T. and Lu, J., 2016. A Silurian maxillate placoderm illuminates jaw evolution. Science 354, 334–336. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aah3764
  78. Zhu, M., Yu, X.-B., Ahlberg, P. E., Choo, B., Lu, J., Qiao, T., Qu, Q.-M., Zhao, W.-J., Jia, L.-T., Blom, H. and Zhu, Y.-A., 2013. A Silurian placoderm with osteichthyan-like marginal jaw bones. Nature 502, 188–193. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature12617
  79. Zhu, Y.A., Li, Q., Lu, J., Chen, Y., Wang, J., Gai, Z., Zhao, W., Wei, G., Yu, Y., and Zhu, M. (2022). The oldest complete jawed vertebrates from the early Silurian of China. Nature 609:7929, 954–958. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05136-8